Hello,
Today we removed our latest gel, stained it and viewed it. Unfortunately we didn’t get very good results – there was alot of blurring on one the low range PFG marker samples, lack of clear band separation on the low range PFG marker samples and no expected band just below the wells for the non restriction enzyme plugs.
We decided that this was most likely due to lack of cell density, and therefore lack of DNA which that could be seen on the gel. We discussed that this could most likely to be fixed by allowing the Propionbacterium acnes samples to grow longer and therefore increase the cell density and DNA, and possibly by centrifuging more of the sample, to reach a higher conc. We also re researched info on cell density within plugs in the manual and journals – we found that the optimum OD was around 0.8-1.0 and we had been working with 0.24. Because of this increase in cell density/conc. we will also need to increase our lysozyme, mutanolysin and proteinase K to compensate.
Mike asked us to run a standard gel, in order to see if there was actually any DNA present at all. We ran a 0.8% gel, for 2 and half hours at 120V/cm with a 1kb ladder. We saw very faint separation, that did confirm that DNA was present, but at very low density/conc. as expected. This also confirmed our modifications which we will put into practise when i come from holiday on Monday 6th August.
After speaking to Mike we decided to attempt to run a new PFGE gel using the whole Propionbacterium acnes restriction treated plug, in one well, in order to use as much DNA as possible, and hopefully see some separation showing multiple bands due to lysis. We ran this 1% gel at 6V/cm, for 15hours with 1-12 sec switch interval ramping, using a whole Propionbacterium acnes restriction treated plug and the low range PFG marker.
Tomorrow we will be viewing this gel and filming our latest videoblog! 🙂