Tag: COSHH

Evening all x Yesterday did a PCR test…

Deborah / / Uncategorized

Evening all x
Yesterday did a PCR test with my cheek cells, mouthwash was yuck! but good news is i’m human. Today was a day of filling in COSHH and risk assessment forms, definately NOT a fun part of my day, but necessary. Confirmed M.luteus so made up stabs and slopes, Chromobacterium CV026 also confirmed, made into stabs and slopes. Made up a batch of TAE and another litre of 50x (Tris base, glacial aceitic acid, EDTA and made up to 1L with distilled water). The main thing i learned, is to not go to lunch and leave the tris to dissolve. increased pressure made it near impossible to remove the stopper, fortunately we are scientists – heating the glass whilst running cold water on the lid, hey presto, the stopper comes off.

Evening All Today myself and Jo came into…

Amy Thompson / / Uncategorized

Evening All! 🙂

Today myself and Jo came into the lab at 9am, and Mike gave us some new stuff to play with! – the newly arrived BioRad plug making kit and restriction enzyme digestion 🙂
We worked through the kit and information provided, made some notes and researched anything we didn’t understand online and through a discussion with Mike. We then produced a new COSHH assessment for our new procedure of making plugs and researched any modifications that journals mentioned when using Propionibacterium acnes specically.

We then made up a stock solution of Chloramphenicol (90 mg/ml), that we will need during plug production. It is a antibiotic, that is bacterial static and stops replication. We will also be using lysozyme, to break down cell membranes, Proteinase K, to break down protein and restriction enzymes, to cut up DNA specifically. Each also has a specific buffer, this is due to enzymes specific nature (pH, Cofactors). We also discussed why it was important to remove remaining EDTA, as it removes cofactors, which are very important to enzyme activity! We also discussed how obtaining the proper cell concentration within the plugs is most likely to be the most difficult part of production. In order to get the most accurate concentration we will be using an OD and CFU/ml against time to produce two sigmoid curves in order to work concentration out.

Excited to start practising these new techniques, so bring on tomorrow morning! 🙂

Afternoon Everyone Myself and Jo came in at…

Amy Thompson / / Uncategorized

Afternoon Everyone!

Myself and Jo came in at 9am this morning, and began filling out our COSHH and risk assessment forms. Although they were a bit of a challenge we managed to get them finished before our PFGE gel came out at 11.30am. Filling out the COSHH form involved making a list of all the chemicals we have used so far within our project, looking up their hazard category (using MDSS – which was very useful!), assessing their exposure potential (glacial acetic acid and ethidium bromide being our highest), steps we could take to protect ourselves (containment level), first aid and how to dispose of them. Our containment level for procedure was 1. The Risk assessment form involved identifying possible hazards within the lab, reviewing control measures we could take to reduce this risk and giving an overall risk assessment rating, ours was medium. I felt that filling out these forms was good practise as next year, during our final year projects, we will be required to do this ourselves for our own projects.

We also watched Mike re culture the Propionibacterium acnes in the anaerobic cabinet, which was really interesting to see!

We then removed, stained and viewed our gel. We managed to obtain much clearer bands and we no longer had very dark areas (large amounts of DNA) within the wells. However we did notice slight band elongation, which is caused by increased temperature. This is expected, as unfortunately the PFGE is still running at 25/26°C, instead of the 14°C it really should be running at.

We therefore decided to keep the smaller amount of DNA we were putting in the wells, keep sealing in the plugs, keep the buffer at 0.5X and not include the initial switch interval as before. In order to reduce the temperature and obtain clearer bands we decided to move the PFGE equipment into the fridge (to run at 6°C). In order to obtain more separation we decided to increase the voltage to 6.0 V/cm. We therefore set up and started a new run with these changes for 24 hours at 6.0 V/cm and with a 45 second switch interval, still using 2 samples of NEB yeast, 2 samples of BioRad yeast and 2 samples of 1Kb ladder. With a second block for 2 hours at 0.6 V/cm and with a 45 second switch interval, in case we weren’t ready to remove the gel.

Really excited to see how the massive change in temperature effects our separations! 🙂

See you all tomorrow!