Tag: OD

Hello Everyone Not much to tell today our…

Amy Thompson / / Uncategorized

Hello Everyone,

Not much to tell today, our new plugs contained far too much DNA and cells, and therefore were very delicate and almost all broke apart during the removal of proteinase K, and addition of 1x wash buffer this morning. We decided to stop production of these plugs, and begin again next Monday as plug making takes around 3 whole days in a row. Hopefully we can perfect the amount of DNA and cells present in the new plugs, to avoid this problem, through measurement of OD/cell density after addition of cell suspension buffer after centifuge.

I will be carrying on writing my final report for the project for the next 2 days, instead of being in the lab and start fresh with lab work and plug making on Monday! See you all then 🙂

Hello Today we removed our latest gel stained…

Amy Thompson / / Uncategorized

Hello,

Today we removed our latest gel, stained it and viewed it. Unfortunately we didn’t get very good results – there was alot of blurring on one the low range PFG marker samples, lack of clear band separation on the low range PFG marker samples and no expected band just below the wells for the non restriction enzyme plugs.

We decided that this was most likely due to lack of cell density, and therefore lack of DNA which that could be seen on the gel. We discussed that this could most likely to be fixed by allowing the Propionbacterium acnes samples to grow longer and therefore increase the cell density and DNA, and possibly by centrifuging more of the sample, to reach a higher conc. We also re researched info on cell density within plugs in the manual and journals – we found that the optimum OD was around 0.8-1.0 and we had been working with 0.24. Because of this increase in cell density/conc. we will also need to increase our lysozyme, mutanolysin and proteinase K to compensate.

Mike asked us to run a standard gel, in order to see if there was actually any DNA present at all. We ran a 0.8% gel, for 2 and half hours at 120V/cm with a 1kb ladder. We saw very faint separation, that did confirm that DNA was present, but at very low density/conc. as expected. This also confirmed our modifications which we will put into practise when i come from holiday on Monday 6th August.

After speaking to Mike we decided to attempt to run a new PFGE gel using the whole Propionbacterium acnes restriction treated plug, in one well, in order to use as much DNA as possible, and hopefully see some separation showing multiple bands due to lysis. We ran this 1% gel at 6V/cm, for 15hours with 1-12 sec switch interval ramping, using a whole Propionbacterium acnes restriction treated plug and the low range PFG marker.

Tomorrow we will be viewing this gel and filming our latest videoblog! 🙂

Evening All Today myself and Jo started our…

Amy Thompson / / Uncategorized

Evening All,

Today myself and Jo started our second batch of plugs, made from 10 different Propionibacterium acnes patient samples and a Propionibacterium acnes 6919 strain. We followed the same protocol as before, but made 4 plugs from the Propionibacterium acnes 6919 strain and 2 plugs from each of the 10 different Propionibacterium acnes patient samples. Mike checked their OD to ensure appropriate cell density (0.25). We also centrifuged down 2 eppendorf tubes containing 1ml of the same sample to pellet, we then eluted the pellet in 200ul of suspension buffer each, in order to produce a cell concentration of 2 x 10^8 ,we then removed 100ul.

Having agarose divided into separate eppendorfs was very useful when melting agarose to combine with the centrifuged samples.
However we did experience a few problems, when trying to pipette the agarose and centrifuged sample into the molds some bubbles formed, and some samples appeared to contain less then others resulting in some plugs being half the size of others. We decided that this was most likely due to one of our pipettes being inaccurate due to liquid internally, and that we only produced exactly how much we needed, resulting in some being lost during the procedure. In order to correct this Mike took apart and emptied the pipette for us, and we planned to modify the method to produce slightly more (10%) to allow for losses.

After the plugs had set, we separated them all into separate eppendorf tubes, added lysozyme and buffer, mutanolysin and incubated for 3 hrs at 37ºC. We then added proteinase K and buffer and left overnight to incubate.

We also discussed more appropriate ladders with Mike, he showed us afew that might be better to use, such as http://www.neb.uk.com/productcatalogue/productinfotransfer.aspx?id=/New%20England%20Biolabs/Markers%20and%20Ladders/PFG%20Markers/N0340.
We decided that tomorrow during plug washing, we would use the online genome cutting software we have used before to find exactly how many and what size fragments Spe1 would produce when lysing Propionibacterium acnes so we could make a final decision on ladder size range, and order one asap.

See you all tomorrow! 🙂

Evening All Today myself and Jo came into…

Amy Thompson / / Uncategorized

Evening All! 🙂

Today myself and Jo came into the lab at 9am, and Mike gave us some new stuff to play with! – the newly arrived BioRad plug making kit and restriction enzyme digestion 🙂
We worked through the kit and information provided, made some notes and researched anything we didn’t understand online and through a discussion with Mike. We then produced a new COSHH assessment for our new procedure of making plugs and researched any modifications that journals mentioned when using Propionibacterium acnes specically.

We then made up a stock solution of Chloramphenicol (90 mg/ml), that we will need during plug production. It is a antibiotic, that is bacterial static and stops replication. We will also be using lysozyme, to break down cell membranes, Proteinase K, to break down protein and restriction enzymes, to cut up DNA specifically. Each also has a specific buffer, this is due to enzymes specific nature (pH, Cofactors). We also discussed why it was important to remove remaining EDTA, as it removes cofactors, which are very important to enzyme activity! We also discussed how obtaining the proper cell concentration within the plugs is most likely to be the most difficult part of production. In order to get the most accurate concentration we will be using an OD and CFU/ml against time to produce two sigmoid curves in order to work concentration out.

Excited to start practising these new techniques, so bring on tomorrow morning! 🙂